JUSTICE works to ensure that UK law protects the fundamental rights of everyone affected by it

Scrutinising legislation and policy
We produce briefings on proposed legislation to assess its compatibility with human rights standards. We also undertake research on various legal issues to highlight concerns about the protection of fundamental rights.

Intervening in the courts

We regularly intervene in cases which raise important human rights points both in the UK courts (the High Court, Court of Appeal, and House of Lords) and internationally (the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice).

Promoting and monitoring the UK's compliance with the international rule of law JUSTICE works to ensure that the UK complies with its human rights obligations under international treaties, such as those overseen by the United Nations and the Council of Europe.

Conferences and training
We organise conferences on important human rights issues and provide training in the Human Rights Act for lawyers and advisers, government departments and public authorities, academics, non-governmental organisations, and other professionals.

JUSTICE Student Human Rights Network
In October 2006 we launched the JSHRN to support all those studying the law and interested in human rights. We have published electronic bulletins and held a series of seminars and are now seeking to expand the network further.

   
 

Scrutinising legislation and policy

Click here to see our human rights briefings

top

Intervening in the courts

JUSTICE has a long history of intervening in cases involving the protection of fundamental rights. The aim of our third party interventions is to assist the courts by providing an independent analysis of the human rights principles and standards at issue in a case, as well as any relevant international and comparative human rights law. Through our interventions, we seek to ensure that the courts have full regard to human rights principles and jurisprudence in appropriate cases. Over the years, JUSTICE has intervened in key human rights cases before the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords, the Privy Council, the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.

YL v Birmingham City Council and others
On 20 June, the House of Lords held by a 3-2 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply to publicly-funded patients in private care homes. JUSTICE intervened jointly with Liberty and the British Institute of Human Rights to argue for a broad interpretation of the Act. Click here to read the judgment and here to read JUSTICE's press release. Click here to read the joint submissions.

Al Skeini and others v Secretary of State for Defence
On 13 June 2007, the House of Lords held by a 4-1 majority that the Human Rights Act applies to all those detained in military custody by UK forces overseas. JUSTICE was part of a coalition of 11 NGOs including Amnesty International, Liberty, the AIRE Centre and Interights intervening in the case. Click here to read the judgment and here to read JUSTICE's press release. Click here to read the joint submissions.

R v F
Intervention before the Court of Appeal in February 2007 concerning the compatibility of the definition of terrorism under s1 Terrorism Act 2000 with Article 10 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

JJ and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervention before the Court of Appeal in July 2006 regarding whether control orders imposing 18 hour curfews violated Article 5 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB
Intervention before the Court of Appeal in June 2006 concerning the compatibility of control order proceedings with Article 6 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Ron Jones v Saudi Arabia
Joint intervention with Amnesty International, Interights and REDRESS before the House of Lords in April 2006 regarding state immunity for torture. Click here to read the joint submissions and here to read the judgment.

Al Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence
Intervention before the Court of Appeal in January 2006 concerning whether the right to liberty under the Human Rights Act and Article 5 ECHR can be displaced by a resolution of the UN Security Council. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the Court of Appeal judgment.

Leeds City Council v Price
Joint intervention with Liberty before the House of Lords in November 2005, as to whether lower courts should be free to follow decisions of the European Court of Human Rights as an exception to the doctrine of binding precedent. Click here to read the joint submissions and here to read the judgment.

Ramzy v Netherlands
Joint intervention with Liberty before the European Court of Human Rights in November 2005, regarding whether the risk of ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR is an absolute bar to deportation on national security grounds. Click here to read the joint submissions.

A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)
Joint intervention coordinated by JUSTICE before the House of Lords in October 2005 between the International Commission of Jurists, the International Bar Association and the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by torture in UK courts. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Limbuela v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Joint intervention with Liberty before the House of Lords in October 2005 regarding whether the Home Secretary's refusal to provide subsistence support to a destitute asylum seeker amounted to a breach of Article 3 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Roberts v Parole Board
Intervention before the House of Lords in May 2005 concerning the use of closed proceedings and special advocates by the Parole Board. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Ullah v Special Adjudicator
Intervention before the House of Lords in May 2004 regarding whether conditions in a state to which a person is returned via immigration removal could engage other Convention rights besides Article 3 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

R v Lambert
Intervention before the House of Lords in April 2001 concerning the compatibility of reverse onus clauses in relation to rights to fair trial under Article 6 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.


Brown v Procurator Fiscal
Intervention before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in October 2000, concerning the use at trial of self-incriminatory statements under the Road Traffic Act, in the context of fair trial rights under Article 6 ECHR. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions and here to read the judgment.

Kaur v UK
Intervention before the European Court of Justice in July 2000, focusing on human rights issues in respect of British nationals who have no other effective nationality and no guaranteed right of entry to any territory. Click here to read JUSTICE's submissions.

top

Promoting and monitoring the UK's compliance with the international rule of law

In addition to the rights incorporated into the Human Rights Act and those under EU law, the United Kingdom also has obligations at international level. It is required to comply with rights such as those set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture. JUSTICE works to highlight these obligations and draw attention to any laws, policies or government actions which appear to be incompatible with them, eg the possible involvement of the UK government in the US practice of extraordinary rendition.

JUSTICE is also an active participant in the monitoring process that periodically reviews the UK's compliance with its obligations under various international human rights instruments. In addition to submitting evidence to the relevant international monitoring body, JUSTICE also meets regularly with the Department of Constitutional Affairs to discuss the UK's reports and submits evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights in respect of the UK's international obligations.

JUSTICE also works to promote the UK's signature and ratification of other international instruments that would enhance the protection of fundamental rights, eg the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings 2005.

JUSTICE and Liberty's joint submission to the UN Human Rights Council's forthcoming examination of the UK under the new Universal Periodic Review procedure
Read a copy of the joint submission here (November 2007)

JUSTICE and Liberty's joint submission to the UN Human Rights Committee on the UK's 6th periodic report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Read a copy of the joint submission here (November 2007)

JUSTICE International Rule of Law Lectures
For full transcript of the first lecture, Five years on from 9/11: Time to reassert the rule of law, given by Mary Robinson at Middle Temple Hall on Monday 20 March 2006, click here
For full transcript of the second lecture, Extraordinary Rendition: complicity and its consequences, given by Philippe Sands QC at Middle Temple Hall on Monday 15 May 2006, click here

Eminent Jurists Panel on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights
London, 24-25 April 2006

Click here to read the brochure containing details of the Panel's work and here to visit the Panel's website

JUSTICE submission to the Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry into human trafficking
Click here to read the briefing (January 2006)

JUSTICE and Liberty's joint submission to the Joint Committee on Human Rights inquiry into the UK's compliance with the UN Convention Against Torture
Read a copy of the joint submission here or click here for a copy of JUSTICE and Liberty's joint submission to the UN Committee against Torture in November 2004 (September 2005)

JUSTICE briefing on the proposed use of military commissions to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
The military commissions as currently proposed by the US fall below the accepted international standards for a fair trial. Click here for pdf versions of the briefing and appendix and here for the press release (July 2003)

top

Conferences and training

Click here to see upcoming events and conferences

top