JUSTICE team mud-run: Donate now!
On Sunday 21st September 2014, four of the JUSTICE staff will be entering the Back 2 the Trenches obstacle course - running 5km through mud, water, fire and all manner of other obstacles to raise money for the JUSTICE internship programme.
JUSTICE offers paid internships in the summer and winter each year, giving law graduates - regardless of their background or financial means - the opportunity to gain practical experience working on law reform and human rights at a national level and providing valuable assistance to the JUSTICE legal team.
Please show your support for JUSTICE and the grit (actual grit!) and determination of its staff by making a donation. Simply click here to donate to the JUSTICE Team and give what you can.
JUSTICE to host fringe events at Party conferences
JUSTICE will be hosting fringe events at the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat party conferences this autumn.
|Labour Party Conference||24th September|
|Conservative Party Conference||30th September|
|Liberal Democrat Party Conference||6th October|
Join us for refreshments and discussion as we explore legal concerns arising from the agendas of the main political parties. The events are free and open to all party conference delegates with passes for the secure zone of the respective conferences.
For more details about the events go to our Events page.
NGOs urge Court of Appeal to preserve access to justice in torture claims
JUSTICE joins together with the International Commission of Jurists, Amnesty International and REDRESS (“the Interveners”) to urge the Court of Appeal to reconsider the High Court’s decision to strike-out the case of Belhaj & Anor v Straw & Ors.
JUSTICE briefs MPs and Peers on Residence test
As MPs and Peers prepare to vote to approve the Government's controversial new Residence test for legal aid, JUSTICE expresses concern about its legality.
Charities and NGOs call on Peers to stand up for judicial review
Today JUSTICE joins charities and organisations from across the UK to condemn the Government’s proposed changes to judicial review. Organisations working for children, older people and bereaved families, with and for prisoners and accused people; expert in disability, mental health, torture and free speech, come together to highlight the constitutional significance of reforming judicial review.
Supreme Court clarifies the duty of disclosure post-conviction
In a judgment given today the Supreme Court considered whether there was an obligation upon the Police and Crown Prosecution Service to provide evidential material not previously seen to convicted persons seeking to demonstrate innocence on appeal or by way of application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The High Court previously held when hearing this case in 2012, that there was a very narrow set of circumstances where the obligations would apply. Although the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, it today confirmed that there is a duty. Whilst it is a narrow one in order to preserve the finality of the conviction, it is far clearer, and will be easier to satisfy for those wrongfully convicted.
Peers to debate judicial review cuts
On 7 May 2014 - next Wednesday - the House of Lords will debate a Motion to Regret the Civil Legal Aid (Remuneration) (Amendment) (No 3) Regulations 2014 (“the Regulations”), tabled by Lord Pannick QC.
JUSTICE has today written to all Peers urging them to support Lord Pannick’s Motion to Regret.
Unjustified judicial review reforms restrict access to justice
JUSTICE welcomes a Report published today, by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (“JCHR”) – an influential cross-party Committee of MPs and Peers – which concludes that the Government’s proposals to reform judicial review and limit legal aid for public law challenges may be incompatible with access to justice and endanger the rule of law.
NGOs question scope of new torture inquiry
JUSTICE – together with a number of other NGOs – has written to the Foreign Secretary to ask how the Government can justify passing the responsibility for the inquiry into the treatment of detainees – formerly under the supervision of Sir Peter Gibson – to the Intelligence and Security Committee (“ISC”).
New cuts to legal aid for judicial review
Proposed restrictions to legal aid for judicial review claims are unnecessary and ill-considered. Because of the way in which the Regulations have been put forward, they may not even be debated in Parliament. JUSTICE is calling on individual MPs and Peers to table motions against the reform.